

The Influence of Economic Factors and Policies on Deforestation in Tanzania
Abstract
In this paper we analysed the influence of economic factors and policy on the rate of deforestation in Tanzania. A multiple linear regression model was formulated and the effects of each factor on deforestation were tested. The ordinary least squares method was used to estimate the model parameters. Correlation analysis revealed that per capita income, per capita purchasing power, and electricity consumption have positive relationship with deforestation rate; while inflation rate and poverty rate have a negative relationship with deforestation rate. All factors were found to be significant and were used for regression analysis. By considering the p-value at 5% level, the coefficient of determination from regression analysis indicated that 87% of deforestation rate is caused by explanatory variables captured in the model; and all explanatory variables had positive impact on deforestation. Thus, it is suggested that policy and decision-making should link with the country’s desire for economic growth and environmental management.
Keywords
References
Blomquist, S. 1980. A Note on the Use of the Coefficient of Determination. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 82(3): 409–412.
Buongiorno, J., S. Zhu, D. Zhang, J. Turner & D. Tomberlin. 2003. The Global Forest Products Model: Structure, Estimation, and Application. Amsterdam Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Cronk, B. C., 2012. How to Use SPSS: A Step-By-Step Guide To Analysis and Interpretation (7th Edition) Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing Daniel, G., 2007. Forest Management Gender and Food Security of Rural Poor in Africa UNU-WIDER, (ISSN 1810–2611).
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2001. State of the World’s Forest 2001 Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome: FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Global Forest Resource Assessment, Country Report, URT. Rome: FAO.
Kaale, B. K., 2005. Baseline Study on Biomass Energy Conservation in Tanzania. SADC Program for Biomass Energy Conservation. Ministry of Energy and Minerals, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kaimowitz, D. & A. Angelsen. 1998. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation a Review, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. Kooten, G. C. & E. H. Bulte. 2000. The Economics of Nature; Managing Biological Assets. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
Kindermann, G. E., M. Obersteiner, E Rametsteiner & Mccallum. 2006. Predicting the Deforestation-Trend Under Different Carbon-Prices. Carbon Balance and Management 1(15).
Le Cessie, S. & J. V. Houwelingen. 1992. Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression. Applied Statistics 41(1): 191–201.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (MNRT). 1999. Tanzania Forestry Action Plan 1994/95 – 2007/08, Update, Draft.
National Forestry Resources Monitoring and Assessment (NAFORMA). 2014. Draft Report on NAFORMA Dar es Salaam. Tanzania Forest Services.
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). 2014. Household Budget Survey 2011–2014, Sixth Round, Government of the United Republic of Tanzania, TZA-NBS-2011-V01.
Nkonoki, S. R, 1983. The Poor Man’s Energy Crisis. A Report of the Tanzania Rural Energy Consumption Survey Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Reetz, S. W. H, 2012. Effects of Land Use, Market Integration and Poverty on Tropical Deforestation, Bongor, Indonesia. PhD Thesis, Georg-August-University of Göttingen.
Scrieciu, S. S. 2001. Economic Causes of Tropical Deforestation - A Global Empirical Application. Manchester, UK. (18):108–118.
Slingenberg, A., B. Leon, W. Henny, R. Koen, E. Lisa & T. Kerry. 2006. Understanding the Cause of Biodiversity Loss and Policy Assessment Framework, ECORYS, Netherland.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.